Monday, May 21, 2018

google plus
Opinion » Comment

Posted at: Apr 21, 2017, 12:59 AM; last updated: Apr 21, 2017, 12:59 AM (IST)

Kashmir: W(h)ither paradise

F.S. Aijazuddin
The very length of the dispute should shame India and Pakistan. Three generations have been born and died on both sides of the LoC since 1947. It was for them that Milton wrote in Paradise Lost: “We know no time when we were not as now.”
Kashmir: W(h)ither paradise
Eden?: Tourists at Srinagar’s Tulip garden. India and Pakistan bear the cost of conflict. — Tribune photo
GOD created a second Eden: Kashmir. Satan has made it his playground. In autumn this year, Pakistanis and Indians will commemorate 70 years of Independence. Jamuvals and Kashmiris have no cause to join in either celebration. The two constitutions they are being coerced to adopt were written decades ago in ink. Their epilogues remain unfinished. These continuous chronicles are refreshed daily by the crimson blood of a hapless nation that yearns to become a state. 

Kashmiris do not need to be suckled on dried UN resolutions nor weaned on the soft bap of hypocrisy. What they deserve after decades of suffering is compassion, understanding. What they demand is the right of independent self-determination. 

This was denied to Hyderabad in September 1948, to Goa in December 1961, to East Pakistan after the elections of 1970, accorded to Hong Kong in 1997, and yet to be resolved in Gibraltar — that British carbuncle on the corpus of Spain. Spaniards have not forgotten that Calais for 200 years remained an ugly English pimple on the fair face of France, until ultimately squeezed out in 1558. Since 1947, three generations have been born and died on both sides of the Line of Control. It is as if for them, Milton wrote in his epic poem Paradise Lost: “We know no time when we were not as now.”

Countless books and articles have been written about the Jammu and Kashmir morass, as many as there are martyrs buried and the living blinded. Open any one of these publications at random. They contain a recurring truth, one Milton articulated: “Who overcomes/By force, hath overcome but half his foe.” Twenty-two years ago, Tavleen Singh published her brave account Kashmir: A Tragedy of Errors. “Today, (she was writing in 1995) there are more than 500,000 troops and paramilitary men deployed in Kashmir to control its population of round 3.25 million, mainly Muslims (…) The state that was once considered the most beautiful in India is now a vast military camp.” Today, the combined population of Kashmir, Jammu and Ladakh is well over 12 m and over 700,000 is the number of Indian troops deployed to ensure their voluntary accession of Jammu and Kashmir to the Indian Union. This Gordian knot has deceptively simple strands. “The government of India maintains that the state of Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India. The government of Pakistan remains committed to calling for the self-determination of the Kashmiri people,” Victoria Schofield (a contemporary of Benazir Bhutto) wrote in her book, Kashmir in the Crossfire (1995), adding: “At present neither India nor Pakistan appears to be in a position to alter its established rhetoric.”

Will there ever be even an intermission during this dangerous minuet of scorpions with nuclear-tipped tails? Will the brittle minds in New Delhi and Islamabad ever be massaged into malleability by the unguents of expediency? The very length of this dispute should shame the two governments into a mature, sober reconsideration of their positions. Will they ever talk without fearing its outcome?  Can ever, to quote Milton again, "true reconcilement grow where wounds of deadly hate have pierced deep"'? The last census conducted in Jammu and Kashmir in 2011 revealed that out of a total population of 12.5 m, Kashmir had 6.8 m, Jammu 5.4 m, and Ladakh only 275,000. Kashmir's Muslim majority stood at 97 per cent, Jammu's Hindu majority at 62 per cent. Ladakh — larger in area than both Jammu and Kashmir combined — has a minuscule, pacifist population of Buddhists. On this side, the population of Azad Kashmir nears 5 m, almost all of them Muslims. Should by some inordinate stretch of imagination a plebiscite take place, will voting follow religious affiliations? Assembly elections in Uttar Pradesh recently have shown that coreligionists in may pray together but they do not necessarily vote together. Will J&K's Paradise Lost ever become Paradise Regained?  Might that happen by 2047, when India and Pakistan shall celebrate their centenaries? Or will that be a wake for a century of missed opportunities? Logically, all stakeholders have an interest in a swift, preferably bloodless resolution. They have come too close too often not to believe that a solution is possible. Yet, they are intimidated not by light but by shadows. “Who is the third who walks always beside you?” T.S. Eliot asks in The Waste Land. “When I count, there are only you and I together/But when I look ahead up the white road/ There is always another one walking beside you/Gliding wrapt in a brown mantle, hooded.” Like the serpent in Eden.                                                                                             

By arrangement with the Dawn


All readers are invited to post comments responsibly. Any messages with foul language or inciting hatred will be deleted. Comments with all capital letters will also be deleted. Readers are encouraged to flag the comments they feel are inappropriate.
The views expressed in the Comments section are of the individuals writing the post. The Tribune does not endorse or support the views in these posts in any manner.
Share On