Saturday, December 07, 2019
facebook
Punjab

Posted at: Jul 23, 2019, 6:59 AM; last updated: Jul 23, 2019, 12:15 PM (IST)

Show Chandigarh is capital of Punjab, Haryana: HC

Advocates-General of both states told to furnish a notification, letter or any other document
Show Chandigarh is capital of Punjab, Haryana: HC
Advocates-General of both states told to furnish a notification, letter or any other document

Chandigarh, July 22

More than 50 years after Chandigarh came into being, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has asked the states of Punjab and Haryana to come out with a document to establish that the city is their capital.

The query came during the hearing of a petition filed by an advocate seeking reservation in the two states by  virtue of him being a city resident. As the case came up for resumed hearing before the Bench of Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain and Justice Arun Kumar Tyagi, the issue of Chandigarh being the joint capital of the two states cropped up as a person declared SC in one state is not necessarily considered the same in the other.

The case, as such, was “unique” as the petitioner was seeking reservation in both the states for recruitment in the superior judiciary on the basis of his being an SC candidate in Chandigarh, the capital of both states.

The Bench initially took up the matter in the morning session after treating it as urgent. After hearing the case for about an hour, it called the Advocates-General of both states. They were asked to come out with a notification, letter, or any other document that showed Chandigarh was the capital. 

Petitioner Phool Singh filed a plea against the High Court and other respondents through senior counsel Rajiv Atma Ram and Arjun Partap Atma Ram. The High Court was represented by senior counsel Manisha Gandhi and Swati Batra.      

The Bench, among other things, was told the petitioner was an advocate, who had appeared for recruitment in the superior judiciary in both Punjab and Haryana. He cleared the preliminary examination for the post of Additional District and Sessions Judge, but could not make it in the mains. The Bench was told that he was treated as a general category candidate in the two states. As a result, he was not selected. — TNS

COMMENTS

All readers are invited to post comments responsibly. Any messages with foul language or inciting hatred will be deleted. Comments with all capital letters will also be deleted. Readers are encouraged to flag the comments they feel are inappropriate.
The views expressed in the Comments section are of the individuals writing the post. The Tribune does not endorse or support the views in these posts in any manner.
Share On